检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘春香[1]
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学课程与教学研究所,上海200062
出 处:《当代教育与文化》2014年第3期24-28,共5页Contemporary Education and Culture
摘 要:美国基于标准的绩效问责制度经历了基于州立课程标准的制度探索、统一绩效问责模式、差异化绩效问责实验、基于共同核心州立标准的改革四个阶段。绩效问责理念由惩罚失败转向奖励进步、由重视外部绩效转向建构基于增值评价方法的内部绩效,设置了多维量化与质性效能评价指标、形成了"七位一体"的绩效问责模式。目前基于共同标准的绩效问责改革面临着新的挑战,对其规律及问题分析可对我国基础教育绩效问责改革有所启发。Standard-based accountability system has gone through four stages :the system exploration based on the state curriculum standards , the national unifying on accountability model , the pilot program on accountability differentiation , and the accountability reform based on the common core state standards . The accountability philosophy has shifted from failure punishment to progress reward ;new reform converted attention from the outside performance to the internal performance based on the construction of appreciation accountability ;the performance evaluation index w hich is multidimensional quantitative has been set up ;a “seven in one” accountability mode has been formed . At present the reform based on the common standard of accountability is confronting with new challenges . The reform of basic education accountability in China can be inspired by the analysis of the regularity and problems .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28