真实性:衡量阅读课的唯一标准?(英文)  

Authenticity: a Golden Rule for the Reading Course?

作　　者：陈洁[1] 宁振业[2] 

机构地区：[1]兰州铁道学院外语系,甘肃兰州730070 [2]西北师范大学外语学院英语系,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《兰州铁道学院学报》2002年第2期115-119,共5页Journal of Lanzhou Railway University

摘　　要：通常出现在课本及专用于讲授的话语 ,其‘非自然性’特征是与‘authentic’这一概念相对的。‘authenticity’这一概念在理论上经历了三个发展阶段 ,在此基础上 ,本文着重讨论它与阅读的关系 ,同时提出了一些个人的理解及建议 ,继而得出‘authenticity’并非衡量阅读课的唯一标准的结论。The term 'authentic' has been used as a reaction against the artificial language of textbooks and instructional dialogue. This paper presents three interpretations as to the theoretical progression of the concept 'authenticity', on the basis of which focus is to be laid on the interpretation of it as far as the reading course is concerned. Some personal understanding and suggestions are also put forward so that the conclusion reached is that 'authenticity' is not the only criterion of approaching the reading course.

关 键 词：真实性 阅读课 语言资料 需求分析 衡量标准 高校 外语教学 

分 类 号：G642.4[文化科学—高等教育学] H319.3[文化科学—教育学]