统筹城乡背景下义务教育资源配置的差距分析——基于重庆和全国的数据比较  

Rural-Urban Gap of Compulsory Education Resources Allocation:Comparison of Chongqing and China

作　　者：宋乃庆[1] 朱亚丽[2] 

机构地区：[1]西南大学统筹城乡教育发展研究中心,重庆400715 [2]西南大学数学与统计学院,重庆400715

出　　处：《教育与经济》2014年第4期3-8,13,共7页Education & Economy

基　　金：重庆市社会科学规划重点项目"城乡统筹背景下重庆基础教育均衡发展战略研究"(2011TBWT03)

摘　　要：通过与全国义务教育资源配置数据的比较分析发现:重庆在2008年统筹城乡教育以来,1.师生比城乡差距在缩小但仍大于全国,城乡差距变化率高于全国(如小学段重庆为8.1%,全国为1.9%);教师中高级职称和提高学历城乡差距大于全国,且城乡差距变化率仍低于全国(如教师提高学历比,小学段重庆为0.2%,全国为3.6%;初中段重庆为1.9%,全国为3.1%);2.教育经费投入和办学条件的城乡差距不断缩小,多数指标城乡差距变化率高于全国(如预算内公用经费,小学段重庆为10%,全国为6.7%),但城乡差距仍然存在。为此,对该市统筹城乡义务教育资源均衡配置提出了有关建议。By comparing Chongqing with national level in terms of resource allocated to compulsory education , wefound that： for the adequacy of teachers, the rural areas is better-equipped than urban areas in Chongqing, for example, therural-urban gap-narrowing speed of teacher-student ratio 8.1% in the elementary schools, performs much better than thenational average 1.9%. Teachers＇ professional rank at mediate or above level , teachers＇ on-the-job schooling are better inthe urban areas .The rural-urban gap-narrowing in Chongqing is slower than national level 0.2%in Chongqing versus 3.6%in terms of the ratio of teachers＇ education enhancement at the elementary education stage for instance; 1.9% versus 3.1% forteaching staff serving junior high schools, and thus the rural-urban gap is larger compared with national average.Educational appropriations and the physical conditions for schools are continuously improving, and the urban-rural gap isgetting smaller. In elementary schools, the rate of growth in public budgetary funds is 10%in Chongqing, 6.7%for the entirecountry）. However, the rural-urban gap still exists. We offer some suggestions for education resources allocation forChongqing, for the sake of rural-urban harmonious development.

关 键 词：统筹城乡 义务教育 资源配置 城乡间 教育差距 

分 类 号：F08[经济管理—政治经济学] G40-054[文化科学—教育学原理]