检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李佳洁[1] 王宁[1] 王志刚[1] 郑风田[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院,北京100872
出 处:《食品科学》2014年第9期291-295,共5页Food Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(11&ZD052);教育部人文社科项目青年项目(13YJCZH078)
摘 要:我国食品安全事故之所以屡禁不止,一个重要原因就是对食品生产经营者处罚力度过轻甚至对有些行为没有规定相应和相当的处罚。《中华人民共和国食品安全法》从颁布实施4年多的效果来看,法律中仍存在不少问题。食品安全问题并不是我国独有的社会现象,英国在第一次工业革命时期也经历了食品安全从混乱到有秩的过程,这与其食品安全立法的逐渐完备有着密切关系,值得我国借鉴。本文通过对英国食品安全立法的演变历史研究,探讨了我国相关立法的借鉴之处,并提出3项立法修订建议,达到强化我国食品安全责任主体法律责任,改善我国食品安全现状的目的。The frequent occurrence of food safety scandals has become one of the most serious problems in China. One of the most important reasons may be due to the lack of stringent penalties from food safety laws and regulations to offenders. Although the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China has been issued and enforced for four years, there are still quite a few issues that need to be revised. Food safety issues are not a unique phenomenon in China. During the first industrial revolution, the UK has also experienced similar food safety crises. It turns out that the process of improvement of their food safety status is closely related to the improvement of food safety laws. This article reviews the historical evolution of food safety legislation in the UK, discusses the current food safety legal system in China, and puts forward three suggestions on regulating food safety liability in the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China.
分 类 号:TS201.6[轻工技术与工程—食品科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117