20年来两岸学界关于“生死问题”的不同进路及其比较  

A Comparative Study between China's Mainland and Taiwan on the “Life and Death Study” in Twenty Years

作　　者：张永超[1] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学公共管理学院哲学系,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《福建江夏学院学报》2015年第4期80-85,共6页Journal of Fujian Jiangxia University

基　　金：中国人民大学伦理学与道德建设研究中心重大研究项目(11JJD720017)

摘　　要：生死问题构成人生的起点与终点。学界关于"生死问题"的研究有两条线索:第一条是大陆学者段德智与郑晓江等分别基于西方哲学史和中国儒释道精神所做的关于"西方死亡哲学"和"中国生死智慧"的进路,在生死观探讨中,大陆学者也逐渐由生死智慧走向"生命教育";第二条线索起源于美国的"死亡学"传统,华人学者傅伟勋教授接续此"死亡学"传统并将其创造性的引向台湾学界,这便是"生死学"学科的确立。尽管大陆与台湾关于"生死学"的研究进路不同,但最终都走向"生命关怀"和"生死教育"。Born and death are the beginning and end of life,which are both key problems for everyone. In twenty years,there are three main different perspectives for life-and-death studies：philosophy of death,life-and-death studies （thanatology）,life-and-death education.With a comparative perspective,there are obvious different ways between China's Mainland and Taiwan on the study of life and death.In China's Mainland,take Professor Duan Dezhi and Zheng Xiaojiang as an example,their studyies focus on the philosophy of death and the wisdom of life.However, in Taiwan,take professor Fu Weixun as an example,he developed the thanatology to life-and-death studies.Although there are two different ways on life and death study, we still find that they are chasing for the same aim in China's Mainland and Taiwan.

关 键 词：死亡哲学 死亡学 生死学 生命教育 

分 类 号：B821[哲学宗教—伦理学] C913.9[经济管理]