检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]成都中医药大学护理学院 [2]成都中医药大学管理学院
出 处:《全科护理》2015年第27期2759-2761,共3页Chinese General Practice Nursing
基 金:成都中医药大学重点教改资助项目;编号:JGZD201208
摘 要:[目的]探讨任务驱动教学法在《急救护理学》教学中的应用及效果。[方法]随机选取2010级护理本科2个班作为研究对象,1个班56人为观察组,另一个班53人为对照组,在《急救护理学》教学中实验组结合采用传统教学与任务驱动教学法,对照组则采用传统教学。教学前采用评判性思维量表中文版(CTDI-CV)对109名护理本科生进行调查,教学结束后对两组护生进行理论考核与操作技能考核,并再次采用CTDI-CV测试以评价教学效果。[结果]采用任务驱动教学法后,观察组护生的评判性思维能力得分高于对照组,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);但观察组与对照组的理论及技能操作考核得分没有显著差异(P>0.05)。[结论]任务驱动教学有利于培养护生的评判性思维能力。Objective:To probe into the application and effect of task-driven teaching method in"emergency nursing"teaching.Methods:Two classes in 2010 undergraduate nursing were randomly selected as the research objects,56 cases of a class were taken as experimental group and another class with 53 cases was taken as control group.A combination with task-driven teaching method and traditional lecturing method is carried out in"emergency nursing"teaching for the students in experimental group,and traditional lecturing method was used for students in control group.All students were investigated with CTDI-CV before teaching,after teaching all students received the theoretical and practical examinations and the CTDI-CV was used again for measuring the teaching effect.Results:After task-driven teaching method,the score of critical thinking ability of students in experimental group was higher than that in control group,and the difference was statistical significant(P0.05);however,there was no statistically significant difference in theoretical and practical test results between both groups(P0.05).Conclusion:The task-driven teaching method would contribute to the improvement of critical thinking ability of nursing students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44