检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南华大学第二附属医院,湖南衡阳421001 [2]湖南环境生物职业技术学院
出 处:《中外医学研究》2016年第1期146-148,共3页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
摘 要:目的:比较PBL和TBL两种教学模式在医学教学中发挥的效果。方法:选取2008年9月笔者所在学校入学的临床医学专业学生246名作为研究对象进行小范围教学试点实验,将246名学生随机分为三组(对照组、PBL组、TBL组),对照组使用传统教学法,PBL组使用PBL教学方法,TBL组使用TBL教学方法,经过五年的学习后246名学生进行一次综合测评,比较各组学生对知识的掌握程度。结果:TBL组优秀率>PBL组优秀率>对照组优秀率(P<0.05),TBL组平均分>PBL组平均分>对照组平均分(P<0.05),TBL组最高分>TBL组最高分>对照组最高分(P<0.05)。结论:TBL教学模式和PBL教学模式发挥的效果均优于传统教学模式,且TBL教学模式优于PBL教学模式。Objective:To compare the effects of PBL and TBL teaching modes in the medical teaching.Method:246 students of Clinical Medicine in our school, enrolled in September 2008, were selected as the subjects to conduct the pilot experiment of teaching on a small scale.These students were divided randomly into three groups(the control group,PBL group,and TBL group),and then the control group adopted the traditional teaching method,PBL group adopted the PBL one,and TBL group adopted the TBL one.Through studying for five years,246 students participated a comprehensive evaluation which aimed to compare the master degree of knowledge of each group.Result:The excellent rate of TBL group〉the one of PBL group〉the one of the control group(P〈0.05),the mean of TBL group〉the one of PBL group〉the one of the control group(P〈0.05),the top score of TBL group〉the one of PBL group〉the one of the control group(P〈0.05).Conclusion:The effects of PBL and TBL Teaching Modes are superior to that of the traditional teaching mode,and the effect of TBL teaching mode to that of PBL.
分 类 号:R-4[医药卫生] G642.4[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.235.224