汉语篇章阅读中反语认知的心理机制:反语表达对肯定/否定数量词“聚焦效应”的影响  

Cognitive Mechanism of Irony in Chinese Text Reading:Influence of Irony on the Focusing Effect of Positive/Negative Quantifiers

作　　者：王小潞[1,2,3] 黄彬瑶[1] 李宏汀[4] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学外国语言文化与国际交流学院,浙江杭州310058 [2]浙江大学宁波理工学院外国语学院,浙江宁波315100 [3]澳大利亚西悉尼大学人文与传媒艺术学院 [4]浙江理工大学心理系,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《外国语》2016年第1期12-22,共11页Journal of Foreign Languages

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"汉语非字面语言认知的神经心理机制研究"(编号:14ZDB155)

摘　　要：本研究运用眼动技术,以字面和反语表达条件下肯定/否定数量词对其后代词回指推理的"聚焦效应"为切入点,在汉语篇章阅读中考察反语认知的心理机制。实验结果表明:加工反语表述比字面表达需要更多的认知努力;作为反语加工的开端,字面义总是首先被激活;认知主体在语境的触发下对字面义作反向推理;最先被激活的字面义会被保留在认知主体的心理表征中,与反语义一起参与加工后期的语义整合。研究结论不支持直接通达模型,但部分支持标准语用模型与分级凸显模型对于反语认知机制的理论假设。By tracking eye movements in ＂focusing effect＂ of positive/negative quantifiers on anaphoric reference in an ironic/non-ironic Chinese text reading, the current study is devoted to examining the cognitive mechanism of irony processing. The results suggest that additional efforts are required in irony processing compared with that of non-ironic conditions, that the literal meanings of ironic materials are always activated at the very beginning, and that both the i- ronic and literal meanings of the text are equally accessible during the final stage of semantic integration. In sum, the finding of the early processing stage for irony is in line with the prediction of the standard pragmatic model while the later stage is in agreement with the graded salience model.

关 键 词：反语 数量词 聚焦效应 篇章阅读 眼动 

分 类 号：H0-05[语言文字—语言学]