“历史”对话“结构”:葛兰西意识形态话语权的范式分析及其当代启示  

A Conversation Between Historicism and Structuralism:An Analysis of Gramsci's Ideological Discourse Paradigm

作　　者：朱文婷[1] 陈锡喜[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学马克思主义学院,上海200240

出　　处：《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第4期84-91,共8页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金重点课题"习近平总书记的战略思维及其对马克思主义中国化的新贡献研究"(15AKS003)

摘　　要：葛兰西并未提出过意识形态话语权概念,但其文化领导权思想实际透露出"意识形态"通过"话语"取得"权力"的逻辑:借助范式的分析方法,其思想得以从历史主义进入结构主义,展现出一个具有宏观话语权生态、中观话语权框架和微观话语权实践的立体图示。廓清与葛兰西思想的异质性,并以共时、历时和即时三个维度建构主导意识形态话语权,这是当代中国从葛兰西话语权范式获得的启示。Although Gramsci had never proposed the concept of ＂ideological discourse＂, the concept ＂hegemony＂ had revealed the logic that the ideology is getting power from discourse. By using the paradigm analysis method, Gramsci＇s ideas could go from historicism to structuralism, and have showed a dimensional view composed by macro discourse ecology, medium discourse framework and micro discourse practice. Clarifying the heterogeneity between Gramsci＇s ideas and the discourse problems in contemporary China, and then constructing the dominant ideological discoorse in the dimensions of synchrony, diachrony and immediacy, that is what should be learnt from the former enlightenment discourse paradigm.

关 键 词：葛兰西 文化领导权 意识形态话语权 范式 

分 类 号：B546[哲学宗教—外国哲学]