开启中国教育内部的“中西古今”之争  被引量:1

Initiating Argument on Comparing Chinese with Western and Ancient with Modern within Chinese Educational Research Field

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:吴元发[1] 

机构地区:[1]教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地南京师范大学道德教育研究所

出  处:《教育学术月刊》2016年第9期22-29,共8页Education Research Monthly

基  金:国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题"德性与规则:西方道德教育的古今之变与古今之争"(CEA130142)

摘  要:中国现代教育内部深层结构中的"中西古今"成分并未达到"自觉"。由此,有必要在中国教育内部开启"中西古今"之争,以厘清中国现代教育对自身传统传承了什么摈弃了什么,对西方教育吸收了什么排斥了什么。并且,有必要进一步辨明吸引与排斥的是西方教育中的现代成分还是古典成分。以便明晰未来中国教育应该坚守什么改进什么。而要做到这一点,必须探讨西方现代教育从古典向现代性转变的机制、动因及过程,以此为参照重新厘定和提出"现代中国教育问题",破除伪西化,以求建立异质而独特的现代中国教育。In the deeply inner kernel of Chinese modem education, as to the constitution of its core resources ,which part is our own tradition, which part is from the western, and which part is from the modem, that is far from self-evident and to say nothing of self-awareness. Therefore, it is inevitable to relaunch the arguments between the ancients and the modems, the arguments on our tradition or the west , so that it can clarify what resources are our education transfer from, and what do not. It will not only make us realize what resources our education have taken in from the western education, and what do not. Especially, to discern what our education has assimilated from the western, is it from the ancient western or just modem western. Such illustration can make out what our future education should insist, what to improve, and what we can do to achieve such target. It is necessary to seriously study the shift of western education from the classical to the modem on its mechanism, motives and processes ,so that it is possible to redefine and raise our own modem educations problems, to remove pseudo-westernization and to construct our unique and heterogeneous modem education.

关 键 词:中国教育问题 现代性教育 中西之争 古今之争 

分 类 号:G40-01[文化科学—教育学原理]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象