日常语言论证的语用逻辑图式  

A Pragmatic Argumentation Logic for Ordinary Language

作　　者：吴炳章[1] 张德玉[1] 王俊梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国海洋大学外国语学院,山东青岛266100

出　　处：《中国海洋大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第5期110-114,共5页Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国海洋大学本科教学工程项目(2016JY133)的阶段成果

摘　　要：普遍语用学理论中的有效性论证是以真值条件语义学为基础的。此论证图式的分离规则极为严格,不能使具有批评能力的听众对日常语言的陈述做出有效性论证。日常语言中的有效性论证关注"可接受性"而非真理性,所以论证图式必须关注主体的心理属性和有限理性。突出"可接受性"的日常语言的论证图式是结论可以取消的语用逻辑。The valid argumentation in the theoretical framework of universal pragmatics is based on truth conditional semantics.The Modus Ponens in the argumentative logic is too rigid to enable an audience,who is capable of day-to-day language communication,to make plausible reasoning.The underlying reason for this flaw is that the valid argumentation in ordinary language is more concerned with acceptability rather than truthfulness.It follows that an ordinary language-oriented argumentation logic should address the mental aspect of argumentation and the bounded rationality in reasoning on the part of the audience.The acceptability-based argumentation logic is characteristic of the defeasibility of the consequence,so it is a pragmatic logic in nature.

关 键 词：真理 可接受性 推理 论证 普遍语用学 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]