检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:屠兴勇[1] 王泽英[1] 张琪[1] Tu Xingyong Wang Zeying Zhang Qi(School of Management, Lanzhou Universit)
机构地区:[1]兰州大学管理学院
出 处:《南开管理评论》2016年第6期4-16,共13页Nankai Business Review
基 金:中央高校基金项目(15LZUJBWZY105;16LZUJBWTD006)资助
摘 要:批判性反思是当今管理界一个非常时髦的术语。领导教练行为作用机理是否显著的一项内容是审视领导教练如何激励下属去进行思考、采取新的认知态度和行为。领导教练行为被视为决定员工创新行为的重要前因变量,但尚未出现关于这种关系及作用机理的系统研究。本文采用282份领导—下属配对调查数据,基于情境互动理论和社会认知理论,构建并检验了一个被中介的调节效应模型。研究结果显示:(1)领导教练行为与员工创新行为显著正相关;(2)批判性反思在两者关系中起部分中介作用;(3)领导—成员交换在领导教练行为与批判性反思之间起调节作用;(4)领导—成员交换调节了批判性反思对领导教练行为—员工创新行为的中介作用。研究证明,被中介的调节效应模型解释了领导教练行为对员工创新的作用机理,不仅丰富和拓展了组织管理的相关研究范围,对员工创新管理实践也提了供有益的启示。Given the severe environment with intense competition and unpredictable technology changes, increasing number of orga- nizations realize that leader coaching is a key element to help the organization to get competitive advantage and an important prereq- uisite for employees promote their innovation. Although existing research suggests leader coaching behavior ean help employee promote performance, the effect of leader coaching behavior on em- ployee innovation behavior did not give full explanation, the empir- ical studies show mixed results and this relationship has remained ambiguous and contested. To test the model, data were collected from 282 dyads of employees and their immediate leaders from 30 technological companies in Beijing, Changsha and Xian with the assistance of the human resource managers. Of 282 participants, 62.4% were male, 37.6% were female. From age structure to see, of 55.1% employees under the age of 30, it means that young people are in the majority. In term of the education, 69.4% have bachelors' degrees or lower degrees. The results show that: (1) leader coaching behavior is positively related to employees' innovation behavior; and (2) critical thinking partially mediates the relationship between leader coaching behavior and innovation behavior; (3) leader-mem- ber exchange moderates the relationship between leader coaching behavior and critical thinking, that is, the higher the leader-member exchange shows that the relationship is stronger; (4) leader-mem- ber exchange moderates the mediated relationship between leader coaching behavior and innovation behavior, in other words, critical thinking mediates the relationship between leader coaching behav- ior and innovation behavior only when the leader-member exchange is limited. Finally, our research indicates that the model of a mediat- ed moderation can better explain the mechanism of leader coaching behavior on employee innovation behavior, which not only enriches and extends the scope of related management, b
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222