我国学习型公共组织的测量及改进建议——基于北京市Y区学习型公共组织的调查分析  

Measuring Learning Public Organizations in China and the Suggestions on the Improvement——the Case of Y District in Beijing

作　　者：胡威[1] 蓝志勇[2] 田昕 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学,北京100872 [2]清华大学,北京100084

出　　处：《上海行政学院学报》2018年第2期43-53,共11页The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute

基　　金：中国人民大学"统筹支持一流大学和一流学科建设"经费支持;北京市组织学习与城市治理创新研究中心阶段性成果(PXM2013_014202_07_000181)

摘　　要：十九大报告指出,要增强学习本领,推动建设学习型政党和学习型大国,提高执政能力。本文讨论如何通过学习成果测评工具的开发,找出学习型组织建设的差距,提高组织学习效率,打破思维边界局限性,建设新型组织文化,克服官僚滞阻,推动组织创新。在文献研究的基础上,文章使用改进版的国际前沿"学习型组织调查问卷",对北京市Y区负责学习型公共组织建设工作的主要干部进行问卷调查,从"接纳差异""反思时间""试验""信息搜集""分析""教育和培训""信息传递"以及"增强学习的领导力"等8个维度评价组织学习成效。通过与标杆分数的比较,审视我国学习型公共组织建设的现状、特点、经验和不足之处,并对未来我国学习型公共组织建设提出思考和建议。The 19th Party Congresses once again called for the building of learning societies to promote organizational change and national governance capacity improvement. This paper, using indexes created by various learning scholars to actually measure exemplary learning organizations in Beijing, China, and evaluates its learning capacity in comparison with international benchmarks. Multiple di- mensions are taken into consideration including acceptance time, reflective time, trial and experiments, information gathering, analysis, e- ducation and training, information dissemination. The findings show that in spite of hard efforts, the Chinese learning organization still lack behind the benchmarks. A lot more could be done to further improve learning in ChinaJs organizations and cities. Also, better mea- surement indicators may need to be developed to help to promote the building of learning organizations.

关 键 词：学习型组织 组织学习 学习与创新 学习型城市 

分 类 号：G729.2[文化科学—成人教育学]