加拿大高校科研伦理规范的监管机制、政策体系及实践启思  

The Oversight Mechanisms,Policy Systems and Practical Reflections of Research Ethic Regulation in Canadian Universities

作　　者：刘晨[1] 康秀云[1] LIU Chen, KANG Xiu - yun(Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, Chin)

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学,吉林长春130024

出　　处：《黑龙江高教研究》2018年第4期78-82,共5页Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目"国外价值观教育现状调查与可借鉴性研究"(编号:16ZDA102);2017年度教育部人文社会科学研究(高校思想政治工作)专项"美国新品格教育可借鉴性研究--对大学生社会主义核心价值观认同教育的创新思考"(编号:17JDSZ3006);吉林省教育厅社科项目"美国新品格教育对吉林省大学生核心价值观培育策略的启示"(编号:1505249)

摘　　要：国家全面推进"双一流"建设的战略背景下,健全并完善科研伦理规范的监管机制和政策体系是实现科研育人从"软指标"向"硬约束"转变的关键环节和重要保障。加拿大在实践中尝试建立了"行会主导""学校自治"的内外联动监管机制,并着力通过制定个性化、协同性的校本政策,提升高校科研伦理规范的针对性和实效性。其中,英属哥伦比亚大学从"处置不端行为""规范审批程序""严肃伦理审查""平衡义利冲突"等四个方面制定科学、系统的政策体系,这些实践经验对我国规范高校科研伦理具有重要的启义。Under the background of national ＂Double First - rate＂ construction, well - established oversight mechanisms and poli- cy systems are the important steps and guarantees for research ethic regulation in universities. Canada has established ＂two -way gov- eruance＂ and ＂internal and external oversight＂ mechanisms in its practice. In addition, it has also developed characteristic university - based policy systems, in order to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of research ethic regulation of Canadian universities. Typi- cally, four concrete policies have been established at University of British Columbia as following, ＂fostering academic integrity＂, ＂management of research review procedures＂ , ＂regulating research involving human participants＂ and ＂solving the conflicts of interest and conflict of commitment in research＂. To some extent, we can draw a great lesson from the experience to promote the ethic regula- tion and academic morals construction in Chinese universities.

关 键 词：加拿大 高校 科研伦理 道德教育 

分 类 号：G647[文化科学—高等教育学]