检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴南[1] 王鹏 何波 周轶平 徐湘婷 陈鹏 沈志强 DAI Nan;WANG Peng;HE Bo;ZHOU Yi-ping;XU Xiang-ting;CHEN Peng;SHEN Zhi-qiang(Dept. of Psychiatry,The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming Yunnan 650032;School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Yunnan Key Laboratory of Pharmacology for Natural Products,Kunming Medical University,Kunming Yunnan 650500,China)
机构地区:[1]昆明医科大学第一附属医院精神科,云南昆明650032 [2]昆明医科大学药学院暨云南省天然药物药理重点实验室,云南昆明650500
出 处:《昆明医科大学学报》2016年第10期137-139,共3页Journal of Kunming Medical University
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81260493);昆明医科大学校级质量工程微课程建设(2013-JY-Y-34)
摘 要:目的研究以案例为基础PBL与TBL整合教学法在药理学教学中的应用并评价其效果.方法药物制剂专业92名学生为对照组,药学专业184名学生为实验组,教学效果采用理论考试和学生反馈相结合的综合评估.结果实验组学生药理学平均成绩(73.68±9.40)分明显高于对照组(67.34±7.18)分,实验组学生反馈(问卷调查)明显好于对照组.结论相较传统教学法,整合教学法能显著提高学生药理学理论考试成绩和学生的学习兴趣.Objective To explore the application of the integrated teaching method of PBL and TBL based on cases in pharmacology teaching.Method Ninety-two students majored in Pharmaceutical Preparations were selected into the control group,and184students majored in pharmacy were enrolled into the experimental group.The teaching effect was comprehensively evaluated by using the combination of theoretical examination and student feedback.Results In the experimental group,the average score of students in Pharmacology(73.68±9.40)was significantly higher than that of the control group(67.34±7.18),and the feedback of the students in the experimental group was significantly better than that in the control group.Conclusion Compared with the traditional teaching method,the integrated teaching method can significantly improve the students'theoretical examination results and students'learning interest.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28