西方形而上学的命运——对海德格尔的亚里士多德批评的批评  

The Destiny of Western Metaphysics-A Critique of Martin Heidegger's Critique of Aristotle

作　　者：邓晓芒[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学哲学系

出　　处：《中国社会科学》2002年第6期38-46,共9页Social Sciences in China

摘　　要：本文通过对亚里士多德形而上学及海德格尔对其评论的分析 ,试图证明西方形而上学的根源就包含在哲学这一人类活动的本质矛盾中 ,根本说来包含在“存在”和“存在者”的互相“混淆”、“颠倒”和“替补”之中 ,因而从古到今 ,任何一个想要拒斥形而上学的人都不得不拒斥哲学本身 ;而反过来 ,任何一个还想进行一种哲学思考的人 ,包括海德格尔在内 ,如果不想沉入东方式的“无言”和沉默的话 ,最终也都不得不走上形而上学之途。从这个意义上说 。Through an analysis of Aristotle's metaphysics and Heidegger's criticism thereof, the author seeks to show that Western metaphysics rooted in the essential contradictions of philosophy, a form of human activity. Fundamentally speaking, it is rooted in the “confusion,' “reversal' and “replacement' of “existence' and “that which exists.' Anyone who attempt to reject metaphysics are, therefore, rejecting philosophy itself. To put it another way, anyone who wants to engage in philosophical deliberation, including Heidegger himself, has to take the metaphysical road if he does not want to study philosophy in the Oriental mode of reticent and silent meditation. In this sense, metaphysics is a destiny human beings cannot extricate themselves from in their philosophical deliberations.

关 键 词：西方 形而上学 存在 存在者 亚里士多德 海德格尔 

分 类 号：B516[哲学宗教—外国哲学]