检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李虹 汪宏[1] LI Hong;WANG Hong(Faculty of Education,Southwest University,Chongqing 400700,China)
机构地区:[1]西南大学教育学部
出 处:《美育学刊》2020年第1期19-22,共4页Journal of Aesthetic Education
基 金:重庆市“渝中区学校美育改革实验项目”;重庆市“北碚区美育改革和发展实验项目”的研究成果
摘 要:教师对他人教学进行评价是促进其自身教学评价能力乃至教学能力的重要手段,但教师的评价必须建立在科学、严谨的标准之上,随心所欲的评价对教学并无大的帮助。审美化教学是一种有效的教学方法,同时也嵌入了严谨的教学评价模式。为了研究审美教学对教师教学评价的影响,通过比较美育专家和"新手"教师对两节实时教学的评价以及"新手"教师在学习审美化教学前后的评价,探索审美化教学对"新手"教师教学评价影响。结果表明:其一,美育专家和"新手"教师在教学评价上存在显著差异;其二,"新手"教师学习审美化教学前后在教学设计、教学操作和学生学习成果三方面的评价都有差异。The evaluation of teachers on the teaching of others is an important means to promote their own teaching evaluation ability and even teaching ability. However, their evaluation must be based on scientific and strict standards and the evaluation at will is of no help to teaching. Aesthetic teaching is an effective teaching method, which is also embedded in a strict teaching evaluation model. In order to study the influence of aestheticized teaching on teachers’ teaching evaluation, this paper explores the influence of aestheticized teaching on "novice" teachers’ teaching evaluation by comparing the evaluation of aesthetic education experts and "novice" teachers on two classes of real-time teaching and the evaluation of "novice" teachers before and after learning aestheticized teaching. The results show that: firstly, there are significant differences in teaching evaluation between aesthetic education experts and novice teachers;secondly, there are differences in teaching design, teaching operation and students’ learning achievement before and after "novice" teachers’ learning aestheticized teaching.
分 类 号:G40-014[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229