检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田霖[1] 韦小满 Tian Lin;Wei Xiaoman(Beijing Education Examinations Authority,Beijing,100083;Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875)
机构地区:[1]北京教育考试院,北京100083 [2]北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心,北京100875
出 处:《考试研究》2020年第4期38-45,共8页Examinations Research
基 金:北京市教育科学“十三五”规划2019年度重大课题“中高考改革背景下北京市教学、考试、招生一体化研究”(CAMA19055)的成果之一。
摘 要:随着高考改革不断深化,考试内容及命题方式也面临着新的变革。国家不再颁布统一的考试大纲,也不再编制考试说明,高考命题回归课程标准,命题内容设计以课程标准和高校人才选拔要求为依据。在这种背景下,高考试卷与课程标准的一致性成为衡量高考质量的重要指标。本研究以高考数学试卷为例,运用SEC模型分析试卷与课程标准的一致性并对SEC模型适用性进行反思,提出SEC模型在高考命题实践中的应用建议。Both of test content and test development are facing new changes with the deepening of College Entrance Examination(CEE for short)reform.As the state stopped formulating unified CEE Outline as well as CEE Outline’s Explanation,test development of CEE would absolutely return to Curriculum Standard,which means that test construct setting will be based on Curriculum Standard and requirements for talent selection in colleges and universities.In this context,consistency between CEE and Curriculum Standard becomes an important quality indicator.Taking mathematics test as an example,this article employes Survey of Enacted Curriculum Model(SEC Model for short)to analyze consistency between CEE and Curriculum Standard,reflecting on the usability of SEC Model,and puts forward suggestions for using SEC Model in test development.
分 类 号:G424.74[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222