检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳华[1] 蒋磊[1] 周婧[1] 白晓霞 姜冬梅[1] 郑莲顺 孙熠 Liu Hua;Jiang Lei;Zhou Jing(Medical School,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310000,Zhejiang,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江大学基础医学院,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院,浙江杭州310000
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2020年第10期3-4,共2页China Higher Medical Education
基 金:浙江省高等教育“十三五”第一批教学改革研究项目(jg20180007)。
摘 要:目的:探讨以团队为基础的教学法(TBL)在解剖学理论与实验课中的应用效果及对自主学习习惯的影响。方法:在解剖学实验课和理论课中,比较TBL实施前后阶段及相同时间点实验组和对照组的考试成绩和形成性评价结果。结果:实验课实验组平均成绩显著高于对照组(P<0.05),虽然理论课平均成绩无组间差异,但实验组成绩优良率明显高于对照组,优良率与TBL实施显著相关(P<0.05)。两课学生的预习习惯与TBL显著相关(P<0.01)。结论:TBL可以提高解剖学学生知识获取,有效促进学生预习。Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness of Team-Based Learning(TBL)on active learning in Anatomy.Methods:The examination results and formative evaluation results of TBL group and control group before and after TBL were compared.Results:the average score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Although there was no difference in the average score of the theoretical course,the excellent and good rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group,and the excellent and good rate was significantly correlated with the implementation of TBL(P<0.05).There was a significant correlation between TBL and preview habits(P<0.01).Conclusion:TBL can improve the knowledge acquisition of anatomy students and effectively promote students'Preview.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80