劳思光与蔡仁厚对阳明“四句教”诠解之比较  

Comparison between Lao Siguang and Cai Renhou's Interpretation of Yangming's"Four-sentence Doctrine"

作　　者：王安权 张海龙 吴小丽 WANG Anquan;ZHANG Hailong;WU Xiaoli(College of Marxism,Xingyi Normal University for Nationalities,Xingyi Guizhou,562400;Minzu University of ChinaSchool of Philosophy and Religion,Beijing100081;Institute of Yangming and Guizhou Studies,Guiyang University,Guiyang Guizhou 550005)

机构地区：[1]兴义民族师范学院马克思主义学院,贵州兴义562400 [2]中央民族大学哲学与宗教学学院,北京100081 [3]贵阳学院阳明学与黔学研究院,贵州贵阳550005

出　　处：《兴义民族师范学院学报》2021年第2期28-32,共5页Journal of Minzu Normal University of Xingyi

基　　金：2021年贵州省教育厅高等学校人文社科项目“《尚书》民本思想及其现代意义”(项目编号:2021ZC051)阶段性成果;2020年贵州省区域内一流学科建设贵阳学院哲学学科学位点建设专项经费资助项目“中国文化二元结构视阈下阳明心学思想的建构”(项目编号:ylxk202015)阶段性成果;2021年贵州省教育厅高等学校人文社会科学研究基地贵阳学院阳明学与黔学研究基地项目“AI+视阈下阳明心学的当代价值和意义”(项目编号:2021jd119)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：蔡仁厚与劳思光对阳明"四句教"的解读或诠解在中国哲学史研究中颇具代表性。劳先生的解读是一种"主体论"式的,他视"四句教"是陈述四个论点,非一有序之系统,他重点对"无善无恶心之体"做了解读。蔡先生的诠解是一种"存有论"式的,他视"四句教"为有一内在秩序之系统,对"四句教"逐句予以疏解。二位先生的解读或疏解虽有相近之处,但更多的是相异。Cai Renhou and Lao Siguang's interpretation of Yangming's"Four-sentence Doctrine"is quite representative in the study of the history of Chinese philosophy.Mr.Lao's interpretation is a"subjective"style.He regarded"the Four-sentence Doctrine"as a statement of four arguments,rather than an orderly system.He focuseed on the interpretation that"the mind-heart substance is neither good nor evil".Mr.Cai's interpretation is a kind of"ontological".He regarded"the Four-sentence Doctrine"as a system with an internal order,and interpreted the it sentence by sentence.Although there are some similarities between the interpretation of Mr.Cai and Mr.Lao,there are much more difference.

关 键 词：四句教 诠解 主体论 存有论 

分 类 号：B248.2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]