检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘丹丹 吴子健[1] 刘忠敏 马俪珍 赵培[1] 雷丹丹 张馨予 LIU Dandan;WU Zijian;LIU Zhongmin;MA Lizhen;ZHAO Pei;LEI Dandan;ZHANG Xinyu(Tianjin Key Laboratory of Food Biotechnology,College of Biotechnology and Food Science,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300134,China;Tianjin Zhimeizhai Food Co.Ltd.,Tianjin 300393,China;College of Food Science and Bioengineering,Tianjin Agricultural University,Tianjin 300392,China)
机构地区:[1]天津商业大学生物技术与食品科学学院,天津市食品生物技术重点实验室,天津300134 [2]天津至美斋食品有限公司,天津300393 [3]天津农学院食品科学与生物工程学院,天津300392
出 处:《肉类研究》2021年第7期15-20,共6页Meat Research
基 金:天津市重点研发计划项目(S18LH01013)。
摘 要:在保证酱牛肉品质的前提下,为实现利用腌制适当提高其出品率的目的,通过分析间歇式滚揉(intermittent tumbling,IT)和呼吸式滚揉(breathing tumbling,BT)腌制原料肉后加工所得酱牛肉品质,并与传统静置腌制酱牛肉进行对比,探讨滚揉方式对酱牛肉水分含量、出品率、水分迁移规律、色差、质构特性及感官品质的影响。结果表明:滚揉腌制提高了酱牛肉的出品率,IT组与BT组的出品率相较对照组分别提高18.83%、28.84%;IT与BT组的横向弛豫时间T22分别为42.86、32.49 ms,显著低于对照组(43.80 ms)(P<0.05);IT与BT组的亮度值相对于对照组分别增加9.01%、18.82%,红度值分别增加12.44%、16.59%,剪切力分别降低15.21%、21.93%,硬度分别降低14.27%和19.53%,滚揉腌制对于酱牛肉弹性与咀嚼性影响不显著;相比对照组,IT组和BT组酱牛肉感官评分总分差异不显著。In order to find the appropriate marination method that can improve the yield of sauced beef under the premise of ensuring the quality,the quality of sauced beef produced by intermittent tumbling(IT)or breathing tumbling(BT)marination was evaluated and compared with that of sauced beef produced using the traditional process as a control.The effects of different tumbling methods on the moisture content,yield,moisture migration,color,texture characteristics and sensory quality of sauced beef products were investigated.Results showed that tumbling marination improved the yield of sauced beef,which was increased by 18.83%and 28.84%in the IT and BT groups in comparison with the control group,respectively.The transverse relaxation time T22 in the IT and BT groups was 42.86 and 32.49 ms,respectively,significantly shorter than that in the control group(43.80 ms)(P<0.05).Compared with the control group,L*values in the IT and BT groups were increased by 9.01%and 18.82%,respectively;a*values were increased by 12.44%and 16.59%,respectively;shear forces were decreased by 15.21%and 21.93%,respectively;hardness values were decreased by 14.27%and 19.53%,respectively.However,tumbling had no significant effects on the elasticity or chewiness of sauced beef,and the total sensory score of sauced beef in the IT and BT groups was not significantly different from that of the control group.
分 类 号:TS251.1[轻工技术与工程—农产品加工及贮藏工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117