检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李震[1] Li Zhen
机构地区:[1]北京大学哲学系
出 处:《哲学门》2017年第2期151-167,共17页Beida Journal of Philosophy
摘 要:王夫之在其著述中对于邵雍思想多有批判。就天地生成而言,王夫之批评邵雍有天无地、有阳无阴,不合一阴一阳的原则。事实上,这一批评出于王夫之对邵雍宇宙观的误读。就运动变化而言,王夫之批评先天图不足以尽神化之妙,指出了其中的机械倾向,但彻底否定先天卦序的做法取消了现象变化的主动性和可能性。就学派归属而言,王夫之将邵雍看作道士与术者,是对邵雍思想的误解,其中可能有着借此以针砭世风的寄寓。Wang Fuzhi pays much attention in his works to criticizing Shao Yong's thoughts.On terms of cosmology,Wang Fuzhi holds the opinion that Shao Yong's view that the sky(yang)exists before the earth(yin)comes into being is against the simultaneity of yin and yang in Yi zhuan.In fact,such an evaluation is not fit for Shao Yong's cosmological theory but out of Wang Fuzhfs misunderstanding.On terms of transformation,Wang Fuzhi criticizes that Shao Yong's Xiantian tu is mechanistic and unable to describe the profoundness of Spirit.However,a thorough negation of the Xiantian order of hexagrams would lead to an unacceptable conclusion,which rules out all the possibility of the transformation of things.On terms of identity,by considering Shao Yong to be a Daoist and occultist,Wang Fuzhi totally misinterprets Shao Yong's theory.Nonetheless,Wang Fuzhi's misinterpretation might be read as an allegory that is aimed at the popular ethos of his time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117