检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:左欣[1] Zuo Xin
机构地区:[1]长春工业大学外国语学院
出 处:《吉林省教育学院学报》2022年第1期19-22,共4页Journal of Jilin Provincial Institute of Education
摘 要:以任务驱动教学模式为基础,通过在线直播和视频录播两种教学模式进行比较,采用学生教育质量评价问卷(SEEQ)调查长春两所高校138名学生的在线学习效率、学习兴趣和创造性思维。实验结果从五个维度(学习价值情感、课程素材组织、小组互动、个人融洽关系、考试和作业)研究了不同教学模式对学习者信念的影响。并就在线教学模式的选择、子任务的设计、完成任务的时间跨度等内容进行了深入讨论,为在线教学的可持续发展和提升学生在线学习效率提供理论和数据支撑。Based on the task-driven teaching model, the two teaching models are compared through online live broadcast and video recording, and the Student Education Quality Evaluation Questionnaire(SEEQ) is used to investigate the online learning efficiency, learning interest and creative thinking of 138 students in twoChangchun universities. The results of the experiment study the influence of different teaching modes on learners’ beliefs from five dimensions(learning value emotion, course material organization, group interaction, personal rapport, examination and homework). In-depth discussions were conducted on the selection of online teaching mode, the design of subtasks, and the time span of completing tasks, which provided theoretical and data support for the sustainable development of online teaching and the improvement of students’ online learning efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31