理论创新的阐释学路径——以李泽厚的“积淀说”为例  

The Hermeneutic Path of Theoretical Innovation——Taking Li Zehou’s Accumulation Theory as an Example

作　　者：苏宏斌[1] SU Hong-bin(School of Humanities,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学文学院,浙江杭州310058

出　　处：《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第3期1-7,共7页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(17BZW060)。

摘　　要：李泽厚的“积淀说”是中国当代最有影响的美学理论。回顾和反思这一理论的产生过程,不仅有助于我们更好地理解李泽厚的美学思想,同时也可以让我们从中窥见李泽厚进行理论建构的方法和路径,从而更好地推进中国当代美学的发展。李泽厚的“积淀说”并不是他单向地运用马克思主义哲学分析和批判康德哲学的结果,而是他把马克思的“自然的人化”理论和康德的批判哲学相互融合的产物。这种融合使得他把康德思想的概念和框架带入了马克思的思想,由此构成了对马克思思想的误读和倒转。但从理论创新的角度来看,这种误读实际上是一种创造性的阐释,是他把自己的先在视域与马克思原有的思想相互融合的产物。这种视域的融合必然产生意义的增殖,从而构成新的理论建构的起点。就此而言,李泽厚创立“积淀说”的过程清晰地展示了一条理论创新的阐释学路径。Li Zehou’s“Accumulation Theory”is the most influential aesthetic one in contemporary China.Reviewing and reflecting on its emergence will not only help us to appreciate his aesthetic thought,but also allow us to catch a glimpse of his methods in constructing his theory,so as to advance the development of contemporary Chinese aesthetics.The theory is not the result of his one-way application of Marxist philosophy to analyze and criticize Kant’s philosophy,but the integration of Marxist theory of“Naturalization of Human”and Kant’s critical philosophy,which allowed him to bring the concepts and frameworks of Kantism into Marxism,thus constituting misunderstanding and reversal of Marxism.However,this misunderstanding is actually a creative interpretation from the perspective of theoretical innovation,an integration of his pre-existing vision with Marxist original thoughts.This integration inevitably produced various meanings and served as the base of new theoretical constructions.The establishment of Li Zehou’s“accumulation theory”,in this regard,clearly demonstrates a hermeneutic path toward theoretical innovation.

关 键 词：积淀说 自然的人化 阐释学 

分 类 号：B83-05[哲学宗教—美学] I01[文学—文学理论]