中小学教育惩戒的司法救济模式与审查标准  

The Relief Mode and Examination Standard of Judicial Relief of Educational Punishment in Primary and Secondary Schools

作　　者：陈菲 林莉红[2] CHEN Fei;LIN Li-hong(School of Social Development and Management,Hunan Women’s University,Changsha 410004,Hunan;School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430073,Hubei)

机构地区：[1]湖南女子学院社会发展与管理学院,湖南长沙410004 [2]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第5期137-147,共11页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：湖南省教育厅教育科学研究项目“教育惩戒权法律制度研究”(20C0982)。

摘　　要：中小学教育惩戒权司法争议类型多样,情况复杂,但总体上可分为侵犯受教育权案件和侵犯人身权案件两类。在《教育惩戒规则》颁布之前,我国法院对教育惩戒权引发的纠纷,主要是作为民事案件进行审理。《教育惩戒规则》第18条提供了新的救济规则,将部分教育惩戒权案件纳入行政诉讼受案范围。根据行政法的一般原理,教育惩戒的司法审查,应遵循惩戒合法性标准、正当程序标准和合比例性标准,既规范教育惩戒权的有效实施,又有效保护公民合法权益。The judicial disputes over the power of punishment in primary and secondary education are diverse and complicated,but generally they can be divided into infringement of the right to education and infringement of personal rights.Before the promulgation of the Rules on Educational Punishment,Chinese courts mainly tried the disputes caused by the power of educational punishment as civil cases.Article 18 of the Rules on Educational Punishment provides new relief rules,including some cases of educational punishment power into the scope of administrative litigation.According to the general principle of administrative law,judicial review of educational punishment should follow the standard of punishment legality,due process and proportion principle,as to properly regulate the educational punishment protect citizens’rights.

关 键 词：基础教育 中小学教育 《教育惩戒规则》 教育惩戒 司法审查 

分 类 号：G520[文化科学—教育学]