强制阐释论的新理据及其悖论  

On the Motivations of the Theory of Imposed Interpretation and Their Paradoxes

作　　者：傅其林[1] Fu Qilin(the College of Literature and Journalism,Sichuan University)

机构地区：[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院,610064

出　　处：《文艺理论研究》2022年第5期122-128,共7页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“新时代中国特色文艺理论基本问题研究”[项目编号:18VXK007]的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：张江的《再论强制阐释》一文试图回到阐释学的元问题,进一步澄清强制阐释的内在理据,从而为当代中国阐释学奠定更为扎实的理论基础。但是此文没能有效地解决强制阐释的困惑,它提出的建构性策略反而使其陷入悖论之中。阐释学的未来不仅是从破到立的线性发展,而且是破中有立、立中有破的悖论性存在,这将催生蕴含“和而不同”之智慧的悖论阐释学。Zhang Jiang’s article “A Renewed Discussion on Imposed Interpretation” intends to return to the meta-question of hermeneutics and to further clarify the inherent motivations for imposed interpretation, and it can be taken as an effort of contribution to the theoretical basis for contemporary Chinese hermeneutics. However, this article fails to effectively solve the aporia of imposed interpretation, and its constructive strategies proposed appeared paradoxical. The future of hermeneutics is not only a linear development from deconstruction to construction, but also a presence with paradoxes mixed with construction and deconstruction, and the resulting hermeneutics presented as a paradoxical one implicated with the wisdom of “harmony without uniformity”.

关 键 词：阐释学 强制阐释 元问题 悖论 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]