检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘华强[1] LIU Huaqiang
机构地区:[1]闽南师范大学学科建设与研究生工作处,福建漳州363000
出 处:《闽南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2023年第1期128-132,共5页Journal of Minnan Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
基 金:福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(JAT200321)。
摘 要:综合素质评价录取机制对信息技术依赖度高、实施中形成大量专门知识,在评价指标上倾向“城市化”,产生了城乡间的信息不对称。与传统高考相比,农村考生群体在综合素质评价模式下弱势更加明显。但是,综合素质评价引起的城乡高等教育入学机会差距并不直接决定于城乡经济差距,更多来源于评价系统设计不足带来的信息不对称。开展农村考生信息弱势治理的措施包括纠正评价导向偏差,强调课程教学、增加劳动教育评价;提供更丰富的公有信息服务、加强相关信息供给的准确性和易读性、降低农村学生及家庭信息获取成本。The comprehensive quality evaluation(CQE)admission mechanism has a high dependence on information tech‐nology,forms a large amount of expertise in the implementation,and tends to"urbanization"in the evaluation indicators,which result in the information asymmetry between urban and rural areas.The rural examinee group is more vulnerable in the CQE mode,compared with the traditional college entrance examination.However,the gap between urban and rural higher education enrollment opportunities caused by CQE is not directly determined by the urban-rural economic gap,but by the information asymmetry caused by the lack of evaluation system design.Measures to deal with the information vulnerability of rural candi‐dates include correcting evaluation orientation bias,emphasizing curriculum teaching,increasing labor education evaluation;pro‐viding more public information services,strengthening the accuracy and legibility of relevant information supply,and reducing the cost of obtaining information for rural students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.222.228