检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴舒曼 李深键 费广洪[1] WU Shuman;LI Shenjian;FEI Guanghong(Faculty of Education,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518060)
出 处:《上海教育评估研究》2023年第4期68-73,共6页Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
摘 要:全面提升保教质量是我国新时代学前教育发展的政策导向和重点要求,而有效评估保教质量是提升工作的重要环节。分析和比较中国《幼儿园保育教育质量评估指南》与芬兰《早期教育与保育评估指南与建议》的异同,发现两国保教质量评估体现出相同的教育与评估理念、原则和方式,芬兰侧重于系统的评估组织架构和多元角色的参与。我国应完善国家学前教育监测系统、建立地方管理系统、重视多种角色合作。Comprehensive improvement of quality of care and education is the policy orientation and key requirement for the development of preschool education in China in the new era,and effective assessment of quality of care and education is an important part of the improvement.The analysis and comparison of the similarities and differences between the Guidelines for Assessing the Quality of Kindergarten Care and Education in China and the Guidelines and Recommendations for Evaluating the Quality of Early Education and Care in Finland reveal that the two countries share the same philosophy,principles and approaches of education and assessment,with Finland focusing on the systematic organizational structure of assessment and the participation of multiple roles.The implications for China are that the national monitoring system for preschool education should be improved,local management systems should be established,and multiple role cooperation should be emphasized.
分 类 号:G61[文化科学—学前教育学] G40-058.1[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249