检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张琳涛 杨鲁新[1] ZHANG Lintao;YANG Luxin
机构地区:[1]北京外国语大学
出 处:《外语教育研究前沿》2023年第3期64-72,96,共10页Foreign Language Education in China
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“新时代卓越外语教师培养模式研究”(项目编号:19BYY220)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:本研究采用质性个案研究方法,通过收集多种数据,基于Lam(2019)和Xu&Brown(2016)提出的分析框架,对两位高中英语教师的写作评价素养现状进行了深入探究。研究发现,教师写作评价素养呈现复杂性与情境性特征。丰富的写作评价实践性知识帮助教师获得了较高的自我效能,树立了以评促学的评价观念,使教师对写作构念有了较为正确的认识。受制于学生人数、考试频次等特定情境因素,教师的评价情绪较为负面。在实践方面,两位教师主导了评价实践,但都努力利用评分标准、学生范文等评价资源来促进学生的元评价认知发展,积极践行以评促学理念。本研究对外语/二语教师写作评价培训的设计与开展具有重要启示。Adopting a qualitative case study approach,this study collected multiple data to explore the status quo of two high school English teachers’Writing Assessment Literacy(WAL),based on an adapted framework from Lam(2019)and Xu&Brown(2016).Data analysis highlighted the complexity and contextualization of teachers’WAL.The two participants gained relatively higher self-efficacy,established the notion of Assessment for Learning(AfL),and formed a proper understanding of writing constructs,resulting from their rich practical knowledge of writing assessment.However,inhibited by contextual characteristics such as a large number of students and frequent examinations,they expressed negative emotions towards assessment.During assessment practices,the two participants played a dominant role,but they both strived to implement the notion of AfL via utilizing various assessment tools such as rubrics and model essays,to promote students’cognitive development in meta-assessment.This study provides implications for designing and implementing training for foreign language writing assessment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145