检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程豪 CHENG Hao(School of Education,Central China Normal University,Wuhan Hubei,430079)
出 处:《现代基础教育研究》2023年第4期125-131,共7页Research on Modern Basic Education
基 金:江西省社会科学“十四五”(2021年)基金项目“乡村振兴战略背景下乡村校长专业发展研究”(项目编号:21JY52)的研究成果。
摘 要:实践者本应与理论者共筑教育研究的主体。然而,社会分工等造成实践者在教育研究中失语。文章以10位拥有丰富研究经验的实践者为研究对象,采用自传法探究他们开展教育研究的心路历程。教育实践者的研究逻辑包括三个螺旋上升的阶段,分别是“在迷茫中萌生研究欲望”“在行动中表达研究过程”以及“在激活中拓展研究空间”。从教育学立场来看,此逻辑彰显实践者对于研究者身份的自觉,重塑实践者与理论者的共存共生关系,建立实践和理论的深度对话,打开了教育研究成果迈向多元诠释的格局。Practitioners are supposed to constitute the major part of educational researchers together with theoreticians.How-ever,the social division of labor has caused practitioners to lose their voices in educational research.This study treated ten practi-tioners with extensive research experience as the research subjects,and an autobiographical method was adopted to explore their experiences in conducting educational research.The research logic of the educational practitioners consisted of three spiraling stages,including“developing a desire for research in confusion”,“expressing the research process in action”,and“expanding the research scope in activation”.From the standpoint of pedagogy,this logic manifests the identity awareness of practitioners as researchers,reshapes the coexistence and symbiosis between practitioners and theorists,establishes a deep dialogue between practice and theory,and opens up the pattern of education research moving towards multiple interpretations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38