社会排斥下男工读生的攻击性与愤怒表情类别知觉的关系  

Association of agression and angry expression category perception under social exclusion among male students in reform school

作　　者：杨潇 王洪 念靖晴 傅丽萍[1] 罗禹 YANG Xiao;WANG Hong;NIAN Jingqing;FU Liping;LUO Yu(School of Psychology,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang(550025),Guizhou Province,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]贵州师范大学心理学院,贵阳550025 [2]六盘水师范学院教育科学学院

出　　处：《中国学校卫生》2024年第3期388-393,共6页Chinese Journal of School Health

基　　金：贵州省基础研究计划(自然科学类)资助项目(黔科合基础-ZK[2023]一般276);贵州省研究生教育创新计划项目(黔教合YJSKYJJ[2021]107)。

摘　　要：目的探讨社会排斥下工读生的攻击性与愤怒表情类别知觉的关系,为工读生心理健康工作的开展提供参考。方法于2023年5月,从贵州省某工读学校随机选取144名学生,使用攻击行为问卷将被试分为高、低攻击性组(77和67名);采用Cyberball网络掷球游戏诱发社会排斥或接纳情景,将被试分为高攻击排斥组(42名)、高攻击接纳组(35名)、低攻击排斥组(37名)、低攻击接纳组(30名)。被试完成类别知觉范式的辨别任务和识别任务,运用类别转折点和识别曲线、方差分析对社会排斥下工读生的攻击性与愤怒表情类别知觉的关系进行分析。结果高攻击性组被试攻击行为问卷总分(97.34±8.00)及各维度得分(身体攻击:29.75±4.61,言语攻击:17.19±2.58,愤怒:22.29±3.66,敌意:28.10±3.54)均高于低攻击性组(74.10±9.02,21.09±4.98,14.30±2.66,17.16±3.83,21.55±3.88),差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为16.38,10.85,6.62,8.20,10.59,P值均<0.01)。在识别恐惧—愤怒连续体转折点上,社会排斥组(2.58±0.07)小于社会接纳组(2.79±0.07)(F=4.85,η^(2)=0.07,P<0.05),社会排斥组具有类别界线向恐惧一侧偏移的倾向;在识别愤怒—高兴连续体类别曲线处的斜率上,高攻击组(0.63±0.03)大于低攻击组(0.53±0.03)(F=5.38,η^(2)=0.08,P<0.05)。在恐惧—愤怒连续体中,高攻击组反应时[(694.86±78.29)ms]大于低攻击组[(660.70±79.86)ms](F=5.08,η^(2)=0.05,P<0.05);在愤怒—高兴连续体中,攻击性和排斥主效应均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。结论社会排斥会导致个体产生敌意归因偏向,而攻击性会使个体对愤怒表情更敏感;社会排斥和攻击性影响表情类别知觉的作用机制是相互独立的。社会应给予工读生包容和接纳,减少排斥和歧视,同时工读教育部门应矫治工读生的攻击行为,促进其心理健康发展。Objective To explore the relationship between aggression and category perception of angry expression in reform school students under social exclusion,so as to provide reference for the reform school students mental health promotion.Methods In May 2023,144 students were randomly selected from a reform school in Guizhou Province,and were divided into high and low aggression groups(77 and 67 students)by Aggression Questionnaire.Cyberball game was used to induce social exclusion and acceptance,subjects were divided into high aggressive exclusion group(n=42),high aggressive acceptance group(n=35),low aggressive exclusion group(n=37)and low aggressive acceptance group(n=30).All the participants completed the discrimination and identification tasks of category perception paradigm,and the relationship between aggression and category perception of angry expression of reform school students under social exclusion was analyzed by using category turning point,identification curve and analysis of variance.Results The total score of aggression(97.34±8.00)and four dimensions(physical aggression:29.75±4.61,verbal aggression:17.19±2.58,anger:22.29±3.66,hostility:28.10±3.54)in the high aggression group were higher than those in the low aggression group(74.10±9.02,21.09±4.98,14.30±2.66,17.16±3.83,21.55±3.88),and the differences were statistically significant(t=16.38,10.85,6.62,8.20,10.59,P<0.01).For identifying the turning point of the fear-anger continuum,the social exclusion group(2.58±0.07)was significantly smaller than the social acceptance group(2.79±0.07)(F=4.85,η^(2)=0.07,P<0.05),and the social exclusion group had a tendency to shift the category boundary to the fear side.For identifying the slope at the angry-happiness continuum category boundary curve,the high aggression group(0.63±0.03)was significantly higher than the low aggression group(0.53±0.03)(F=5.38,η^(2)=0.08,P<0.05).In the fear-anger continuum,the high-aggression group[(694.86±78.29)ms]reacted more quickly than the low-aggression group[(660.70±

关 键 词：社会排斥 攻击 精神卫生 学生 知觉 男(雄)性 

分 类 号：G444[哲学宗教—心理学] G478[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学] R193[文化科学—教育学] C913[文化科学—教育技术学]