混合式教学随机对照试验研究的医学教育论文质量分析  

Analysis of the quality of medical education papers on randomized controlled trials of blended learning

作　　者：唐小平[1] 谢卫华 马凌飞 龚杰 舒畅 沈香娣[2] TANG Xiaoping;XIE Weihua;MA Lingfei;GONG Jie;SHU Chang;SHEN Xiangdi(Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Hangzhou 310002,China;Journal Editorial Department of Hangzhou Medical College,Hangzhou 310013,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学医学院附属第一医院呼吸与危重症医学科,杭州310002 [2]杭州医学院期刊编辑部,杭州310013

出　　处：《浙江医学教育》2024年第3期150-154,180,共6页Zhejiang Medical Education

摘　　要：目的 分析我国医学教育领域混合式教学随机对照试验研究的期刊论文质量,以规范混合式教学随机对照试验研究论文的写作和提高混合式教学随机对照试验研究论文的水平。方法 在中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网、Scopus数据库检索相关论文,共纳入自建库起至2023年12月31日发表的我国医学教育领域混合式教学随机对照试验研究论文73篇。参考CONSORT规范的条目自制论文质量分析量表。量表包含5个主题内容22个条目:文题和摘要主题(含2个条目)、引言主题(含2个条目)、方法主题(含13个条目)、结果主题(含3个条目)、讨论和其他主题(含2个条目)。若论文中具有符合或描述此条目的内容,计1分,否则计0分,各条目的评分相加得出论文的总分。同时,比较核心期刊论文与非核心期刊论文、双一流高校论文与非双一流高校论文之间的评分差异。结果 本研究最终纳入73篇中文论文进行分析。73篇论文整体评分为(12.02±3.79)分,最低评分为5分,最高评分为17分。在22个条目中,有10个条目的论文符合率低于50.0%。其中,以下5个条目中的论文符合率最低:“文题能够识别是随机对照试验”和“随机化后脱落的例数和原因”的论文符合率均为0%;“研究所需要的样本量”的论文符合率为1.4%(1/73);“受试者合格的纳入标准”的论文符合率为13.7%(10/73);“随机序列产生的方法”的论文符合率为21.9%(16/73)。核心期刊论文与非核心期刊论文(t=0.304,P=0.605)、双一流高校论文与非双一流高校论文(t=1.674,P=0.532)之间的评分差异均无统计学意义。结论 我国医学教育领域混合式教学随机对照试验研究的论文整体质量不高。其中,研究者对“文题能够识别是随机对照试验”、“随机化后脱落的例数和原因”、“研究所需要的样本量”、“受试者合格的纳入标准”和“随机序列产生的方Objective To analyze the quality of journal articles on randomized controlled trials(RCTs)in the field of medical education in China,in order to standardize the writing of RCT research papers in blended learning and to improve the level of such research papers.Methods Relevant papers were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform,VIP Information Network,and Scopus database.A total of 73 domestic medical education papers on RCTs in blended learning,published from the establishment of the database until December 31,2023,were included.A quality analysis scale was self.made with reference to the CONSORT(consolidated standards of reporting trials)guidelines.The scale included 5 themes and 22 items:Title and Abstract(2 items),Introduction(2 items),Methods(13 items),Results(3 items),Discussion and Other(2 items).If a paper contained content that met or described the item,it was scored 1 point;otherwise,it was scored 0 points.The scores of each item were added together to obtain the total score of the paper.The differences in scores between core journal papers and non-core journal papers,and between papers from double first-class universities and non-double first-class universities were compared.Results A total of 73 Chinese papers were included for analysis.The overall score of the 73 papers was(12.02±3.79)points,with the lowest score being 5 points and the highest score being 17 points.Among the 22 items,the compliance rate of papers for 10 items was less than 50.0%.Specifically,the compliance rate for the following 5 items was the lowest:“Title can be identified as a randomized controlled trial”and“Number and reasons for dropouts after randomization”had a compliance rate of 0%;“Sample size required for the study”had a compliance rate of 1.4%(1/73);“Eligibility criteria for participants”had a compliance rate of 13.7%(10/73);“Method of random sequence generation”had a compliance rate of 21.9%(16/73).There was no statistically significant

关 键 词：混合式教学 随机对照试验 医学教育 论文 质量分析 

分 类 号：G424.1[文化科学—课程与教学论] R-05[文化科学—教育学]