检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜嘉[1] Du Jia(Basic Courses Teaching Department,Henan Judicial Police Vocational College,Zhengzhou 450016,Henan)
机构地区:[1]河南司法警官职业学院基础教学部,河南郑州450046
出 处:《中国电化教育》2024年第9期122-128,共7页China Educational Technology
基 金:2023年度河南省高等教育教改课题“职业院校外语课程质量建设提升路径与模式创新研究”(课题编号:2021SJGLX785);2024年度河南省教育科学规划项目(项目编号:2024YB0477)阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:新冠肺炎疫情引发了大规模的在线教学实践,有力地促进了在线课程的建设和纯线下传统教学向混合式教学新生态的变革。疫情后,在线课程成为常规教学不可或缺的一部分,线上教学的特殊性带来了对在线课程教学效果评价的新探索。然而,当前高校线上教学评价在评价对象、评价指标和评价逻辑三个方面均存在较大误区。该文提出教学评价应该遵循的原则,并基于这些原则构建了一个包含课程思政的教学效果评价模型,且对模型进行了实践验证,为高校在线课程评价提供了一个新的方案。。The COVID-19 has triggered a large-scale online teaching practice,which has effectively promoted the construction of online courses and the transformation of pure offline traditional teaching into a new ecology of hybrid teaching.After the epidemic,online courses have become an indispensable part of routine teaching,and the particularity of online teaching has brought new explorations in evaluating the effectiveness of online course teaching.However,there are significant misconceptions in the current evaluation of online teaching in universities in terms of evaluation objects,evaluation indicators,and evaluation logic.This article puts forward some principles for effective teaching evaluation,and constructs a teaching effectiveness evaluation model that includes course ideological and political education based on the principles,which is verified in practice,providing a new solution for online course evaluation in universities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3