熙宁变法中的道学之争及审美转向  

The controversy over Daoism and the aesthetic turn in the Xining Reforms

作　　者：李昌舒[1] 曹务龙 LI Chang-shu;CAO Wu-long

机构地区：[1]南京大学文学院,江苏南京210000 [2]泰州学院人文学院,江苏泰州225300

出　　处：《东南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第6期121-130,149,共11页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“中国士人美学研究”(24BZX050);国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国古代美学命题整理与研究”(21&ZD068)成果之一。

摘　　要：熙宁变法不仅是一个政治事件,更是北宋风起云涌的儒家思想内部的一次激烈冲突,主要是二程为代表的洛学与王安石为代表的新学之间的矛盾。已有研究大多集中于变法的政治冲突,或者是具体的学术之争,但通过对二者思想的深入分析,可以看到,二者有同有异:异者,是关于“道”与“术”的关系,或者说“道”为一还是为二;同者,都致力于性命道德的追求。变法及其失败对于洛学以及南宋理学的发展具有重要影响,奠定了两宋之际文化转向的雏形。北宋前中期士人关于审美的焦虑在这一过程中也得以消解,“道”成为审美的标准,这也是南宋美学转向内在的根本原因。The Xining Reformswas more a fierce conflict within Confucian thought schools mainly including the Luoxue represented by the Cheng brothers and the New Policies represented by Wang Anshi than it was a political event in the Northern Song Dynasty. Existing research has largely focused on the political conflict or specific scholarly disputes. However, our in-depth analysis of their ideologies shows that they share both similarities and differences. The difference lies in the relationship between Dao and technique, or whether Dao is one or two, while the similarity lies in their dedication to the pursuit of ethical life. The Xining Reforms and its failure had a significant impact on the development of the Luoxue school and the Neo-Confucianism of the Southern Song Dynasty. From this point onward began the cultural shift between the two Song dynasties. The anxiety about aesthetics among the literati during the early and middle Northern Song Dynasty also diminished in this process. Gradually, Dao became the aesthetics standard. This was also the fundamental reason for the shift in Southern Song aesthetics.

关 键 词：熙宁变法 道学之争 新学 洛学 审美转向 

分 类 号：K244[历史地理—历史学] B244[历史地理—中国史]