检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马利红 MA Lihong
机构地区:[1]北京理工大学
出 处:《语言测试与评价》2024年第2期79-90,共12页Language Testing and Assessment
基 金:国家教育考试科研规划2021年度重点课题“新高考背景下英语学科核心素养测评研究”(课题编号:GJK2021011)的部分成。
摘 要:随着《普通高中英语课程标准(2017年版)》的颁布,英语学科思维品质测评研究受到广泛关注。然而,以往研究主要集中在理论探讨层面,缺乏测评工具的研发及效度检验。本研究以思维的批判性测评为例,基于读写结合写作任务研发思维批判性评估工具,并通过Rasch模型对其效度进行验证。研究结果表明,读写结合的评估方式不仅符合模型预期,而且在评分一致性、题目难度与受试能力匹配度,以及难度和区分度的合理分布等方面表现良好。本研究在开发和修正思维批判性评估工具过程中所采用的方法和效度验证步骤,为英语学科核心素养测评研究提供了经验和参考。With the release of the National High School English Curriculum Standards(2017 Edition),research on the assessment of thinking quality in the English subject has gained widespread attention.However,previous studies have predominantly centered on theoretical exploration,with limited emphasis on developing and validating assessment tools.This study took the evaluation of critical thinking as an example,developing a critical thinking assessment tool based on a reading-writing integrated task and validating its validity using the Rasch model.The results showed that the integrated assessment approach not only met the model’s expectations but also performed well in terms of scoring consistency,alignment of task difficulty with test-taker ability,and distribution of item difficulty and item discrimination.The methods and validation steps employed in the development and refinement of the critical thinking assessment tool offer valuable insights and serve as a useful reference for research on assessing core literacy in English.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.96.228