佩特、米开朗基罗与中世纪:一种“奇异性”  

Walter Pater,Michelangelo and the Middle Ages:A“Strangeness”

作　　者：陈书焕 Chen Shuhuan(College of Arts and Media,Tongji University;The Center for Italian Studies,Tongji University)

机构地区：[1]同济大学艺术与传媒学院 [2]同济大学意大利研究中心

出　　处：《美术》2025年第4期129-140,共12页Art Magazine

基　　金：国家社科基金艺术学项目《19世纪英国艺术批评理论和历史意识研究》(项目编号:20BA016)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：本文以个案研究的方式考察批评理论对历史理解的参与。19世纪后期英国著名批评家佩特出版于1873年的《文艺复兴史研究》是其具有广泛影响力的著述,其中对文艺复兴和中世纪直接相关性的阐释,通过对米开朗基罗的解读贯穿起来。米开朗基罗作品中混合着力量和甜蜜的奇异性,在佩特的写作中不仅作为个体艺术体验的现象,还作为广泛历史理解的表达,关联起历史写作的风格。在19世纪英国与欧洲艺术思想史语境中,佩特的观点可以被视为“奇异性”在艺术批评和历史研究之间的沟通,进而为当前跨学科视域下考察历史意识问题提供了一种可能的方法论思考。This article examines the participation of critical theory in historical understanding through case study.The Studies in the History of the Renaissance,published by famous British critic Walter Pater in 1873,is a masterpiece with wide-ranging influence,in which the direct correlation between the Renaissance and the Middle Ages is explained with his analysis of Michelangelo as a main line.In this book,the strangeness of Michelangelo's works,a mixture of power and sweetness,is a phenomenon of individual artistic experience,and a broad expression of historical understanding that is connected with the style of historical writing.In the artistic idea history of Britain and Europe as a whole in the 19th Century,Pater's views can be regarded as exchanges of“strangeness”between art criticism and historical research,and thus have provided a possible methodology for examining historical awareness from the interdisciplinary perspective.

关 键 词：历史理解 奇异性 佩特 米开朗基罗 中世纪 艺术批评 

分 类 号：J110.9[艺术—艺术理论]