检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京科技大学经济管理学院,北京 [2]阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司北京总部,北京 [3]武汉大学哲学学院心理学系,武汉
出 处:《现代管理》2022年第9期1114-1126,共13页Modern Management
摘 要:通过运用层次线性模型,对52组367名员工的有效数据进行回归分析,考察了多层次辱虐管理在团队和个体层次上对员工工作行为的影响及作用过程。研究结果表明:1) 在个体层次上,辱虐管理与个体员工的反生产行为与组织公民行为均存在显著的相关性;2) 在团队层次上,辱虐管理与团队的反生产行为与组织公民行为均存在显著的相关性;3) 互动公平在辱虐管理与反生产行为、组织公民行为的作用路径中充当中介变量;4) 团队辱虐氛围在个体辱虐管理和互动公平感知间起到调节作用。This study used Hierarchical Linear Models (HLM) to perform regression analysis on the valid data of 367 employees in 52 groups, and examined the impact and effect process of multi-level abusive supervision on employees’ work behavior at the team and individual levels. The research results proved that: 1) At the individual level, there is significant positive correlation between abusive supervision and employee’s counterproductive behaviors, and there is significant negative correlation between abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behaviors. 2) At the team level, there is significant positive correlation between abusive supervision and team counterproductive behaviors, and there is significant negative correlation between abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behaviors. 3) The indirect effects of abusive supervision on member counterproductive behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors are mediated by interactive justice as well as interactive justice atmosphere. 4) At the individual level, team-level abusive atmosphere plays as the moderator in the relationship between individual abusive supervision and the interactive justice perception.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42