检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘丽莎
机构地区:[1]南方科技大学语言中心,广东 深圳
出 处:《国外英语考试教学与研究》2024年第3期119-127,共9页Overseas English Testing: Pedagogy and Research
摘 要:本文深入比较了三种“互联网+”教学模式——纯线上、混合式以及融合式——在高校英语辩论课程中的应用与效果。笔者首先界定了纯线上教学的内涵和特点,并详细描述了其在英语辩论课程中的具体实施策略,包括资源的有效利用、在线互动的促进以及评估与反馈的优化。其次,笔者讨论了融合传统面对面教学与现代在线教学优势的混合式教学模式,并对其在英语辩论课程中的实践进行了深入分析。随后,笔者又探讨了融合式教学模式。该模式强调线上与线下教学活动的无缝整合,以实现英语辩论教学策略的优化。最终,通过综合比较这三种教学模式,笔者提出了相应的实施策略和具体建议,旨在推动高校英语辩论教学的创新和持续发展。This paper describes an in-depth comparison of three “Internet Plus” teaching models—Online, Blended, and Hyflex—in terms of their application and effectiveness in English debate courses at Chinese universities. The author first defined the concept and characteristics of online teaching and described its specific implementation strategies in English debate courses, including the effective use of resources, promotion of online interaction, and optimization of assessment and feedback. Secondly, the author discussed the blended teaching model, which combines the strengths of traditional face-to-face teaching with modern online teaching, and offered an in-depth analysis of its implementation in English debate courses. Next, the author explored the Hyflex teaching model, which emphasizes the seamless integration of online and offline teaching activities to enhance the teaching strategies for English debate. Finally, some implementation strategies and specific recommendations were provided based on the comprehensive comparison of these three teaching models. It aims at fostering innovation and sustainable development in college English debate teaching.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49