检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙丽萍[1,2] 徐响[1,2] 黄少康[3] 杜立[3] 董捷[1,2] 杨佳林[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中国农业科学院蜜蜂研究所,北京100093 [2]国家蜂产品加工技术分中心,北京100093 [3]福建农林大学蜂学学院,福建福州350002
出 处:《食品科学》2009年第21期75-78,共4页Food Science
基 金:农业部公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费项目(nyhyzx07-041)
摘 要:以蜂胶为原料,分别以甲醇、乙醇、氯仿、蒸馏水为溶剂进行萃取,测定各萃取物总酚与黄酮类物质的含量,通过测定还原能力,清除DPPH自由基能力的测定来比较4种不同萃取物的抗氧化性。结果表明:甲醇萃取物具有较强的抗氧化性。甲醇萃取物浓度为0.25mg/ml时还原力高达1.162,且浓度为0.05mg/ml时对DPPH自由基清除率为64.676%。乙醇萃取物通过石油醚、氯仿、乙酸乙酯、丙酮依次分级萃取后所得到4种萃取物各项指标测定结果表明,氯仿萃取了蜂胶乙醇萃取物中主要成分,但乙酸乙酯和丙酮萃取物的还原能力及清除DPPH自由基清除能力较佳,在浓度为0.05mg/ml时还原力分别为2.087和1.798,DPPH自由基清除率达87.724%和88.013%。Different solvents such as methanol, ethanol, chloroform and distilled water were used to extract propolis. The contents of total flavonoids and total phenols in different solvent extracts were analyzed. Meanwhile, reducing power and DPPH free radical scavenging capacity were determined to compare antioxidant activity of four different solvent extracts. Results indicated that methanol and ethanol extracts had strong antioxidant activity. The reducing power of methanol extract was as high as 1.162 at 0.25 mg/ml concentration of and scavenging rate of methanol extract for DPPH free radicals was 64.676% at 0.05 mg/ml concentration of. The sequential extractions using petroleum ether, chloroform, ethyl acetate and acetone were applied to ethanol extract of propolis. A maximum extraction efficiency was achieved using chloroform. The reducing power of chloroform-soluble extract reached 2.087 and the scavenging capacity for DPPH free radicals as high as 87.724% at 0.05 mg/ml concentration.
分 类 号:TS201.2[轻工技术与工程—食品科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3