检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学人事处,广东广州510631 [2]华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广东广州510631 [3]华南师范大学教务处,广东广州510631
出 处:《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第4期44-47,共4页Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(09YJCXLX007);广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(09SJYQ007)
摘 要:采用调查法,从教师特征和课程特征入手,分别探讨教师学历、教师职称与课程类别、课程性质对高校学生评教分数的影响。研究发现,教师学历与教师职称对学生评教分数的主效应显著,但二者的交互作用不显著;课程类别、课程性质及其二者的交互作用均对学生的评教分数有显著的影响。Students' evaluations or ratings of teaching is a process in which students evaluate their teacher's teaching quality,and it has been received much attention in educational psychology.This study explored the effects of the characters of teacher and course on students' evaluations of teaching.The results showed that the main effects of professional titles and academy degrees on students' evaluations of teaching were significant.The scale for instructor was lower than assistant and associate professor,but there was no difference between instructor and professor.The main effect of course types and the main effect of course characters were also significant,especially,the interaction effect between course types and course characters on the rating scale was significant.The simple effect tests revealed that the rating scale of intra-university elective course was higher than the obligatory course and intradepartment elective course for science and engineering,whereas the intra-department elective course for technique was higher than intra-university elective course and obligatory course,for art and social science,there were no difference among the three types.
关 键 词:教师学历 教师职称 课程类别 课程性质 评教分数
分 类 号:G42[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117