1948年与改革开放后高中英语课程文件对比研究  

The Comparative Study between the English Curriculum Documents for Senior Middle Schools in 1948 and Those since the Reform and Opening Up

作　　者：于月清[1] 张帆[2] 

机构地区：[1]聊城大学外国语学院,山东聊城252059 [2]北京青年政治学院英语系,北京100102

出　　处：《聊城大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第6期78-83,共6页Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：2009-2010国家基础教育外语教育研究中心资助项目(JJWYYB2009109):1948年与改革开放后英语课程文件对比研究

摘　　要：对1948年与改革开放后各高中英语课程文件的结构、课程目标、课程内容以及课程实施等方面进行对比得知,改革开放后课标结构更加完整、周密、系统,更加重视学生全面素养发展,课程内容更加综合化、目标化、语用化,课程实施的内涵更加丰富,评价被纳入英语课程,并逐步建立了一套完整体系,教师获得了更大的弹性空间;但前后两个时期的课程文件均为适应社会变革需要、汲取长期经验教训而颁行,均十分重视课程目标、课程内容和课程实施三方面的课程规划,均重视"双基"的锤炼。From the contrast of the structure, course objectives, course content and curriculum imple- mentation of the English curriculum documents for senior middle schools in 1948 and those since the Re- form and Opening up,it is known that the structure of the document is more complete, thorough and sys- tematic, the comprehensive literacy of students has got more attention, course content has been more inte- grated, targeted and pragmatic, the intention of curriculum implementation has been increasingly enriched, evaluation has been included in English curriculum, and gradually become a complete system, and teachers have acquired greater flexible space since the Reform and Opening up. But the similarities are that they both were issued in adaption to social change and drawn thelong--term lessons,attached great importance to the three areas such as course objectives, course content and curriculum implementation and emphasized the tamping of ＂double--base＂.

关 键 词：英语课程文件 对比 结构 课程目标 课程内容 课程实施 

分 类 号：G423.04[文化科学—课程与教学论]