检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南大学教育学部,重庆400715
出 处:《教育发展研究》2015年第15期83-89,共7页Research in Educational Development
摘 要:教学实践的诸多两难困境反映为教学研究中领域一般与领域特殊的争论。领域一般教学研究秉持形式优先性的观念,强调教学形式在教学中的决定作用,通过教学形式化而获得普适实用的理论工具用以指导教学。领域特殊教学研究则从教学内容、教师的教和学生的学三个方面证明了教学的领域特殊性,强调具体教学内容和教学情境对教学活动的影响。领域一般和领域特殊之争的实质是教学内容与教学形式之争,内容与形式之分是论争的根源。考察教学内容与教学形式之间的关系,发现教学研究中领域一般与领域特殊之间除了差异与对立,还存在相反相成、相容共存的互补关系和相互佐证、互生互长的互动关系。教学研究的领域一般与领域特殊之间的矛盾在互补与互动的层面上能够得到解决。There are many dilemmas in teaching practice, causing debates upon domain generality and domain specificity of teaching research. Teaching research in domain generality insists the privilege of "form", and emphasizes that teaching form is decisive in teaching, and wishes to guide teaching by universal theoretic tools which stem from teaching formalizing. While teaching researches in domain specificity demonstrate the teaching specificity in teaching content, teachers" performance and students" performance, thus emphasizing the influence of specific teaching content and teaching context on teaching activity. The essence of debates upon domain generality and domain specificity of teaching research is debate on teaching content and form, which stemmed from the division of content and form. Inspecting the relation between teaching content and teaching form, it is found that there are complementary and interactive relationships between domain generality and domain specificity of teaching research besides differences and oppositions between them. The contradiction between domain generality and domain specificity of teaching research can be solved on the level of complement and interaction between them.
关 键 词:教学研究 领域一般 领域特殊 教学内容 教学形式
分 类 号:G420[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145