检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘为浒 殷美[1] 黄骥[1] 王友华[1] 郝佩佩[1] Liu Weihu Yin Mei Huang Ji Wang Youhua Hao Peipei(College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095)
出 处:《上海教育评估研究》2016年第5期59-64,共6页Shanghai Journal of Educational Evaluation
基 金:江苏省品牌专业建设项目(PPZY2015A059);南京农业大学校级品牌专业专项(2015P002)研究成果
摘 要:学业评价要求对教育的价值给出评判,它在拔尖创新人才培养中占有导向性的重要作用。本文根据农学类人才培养特点和作者的教学实践,探讨了建立具有较高效度、较高信度以及具有良好的可操作性的学业评价体系的做法,指出应该从改进笔试评价、构建过程性评价、夯实民主评价、关注非预期成果的评价等方面入手,逐步建立完善有利于创新人才成长评价体系。文章分析上述每一种评价方法存在的问题,给出了具体实施方法。Academic evaluation should give an assessment for the education values. It plays a leading role in top-notch innovative personnel training. Based on the authors' experience and the characteristics of agronomic students, the paper deals with the establishment of such an eval- uation system with high validity, reliability and good operability. It points out that the reform should consist of four aspects: the improvement of the written evaluation, the construction of the process evaluation, consolidation of democratic evaluation, and the evaluation of the unexpected results. Starting with these measures, an evaluation system which benefits innovative talents growth can be gradually established. Some current problems and improving suggestions are pre- sented in the paper.
关 键 词:农业类高校 创新人才培养 学业评价 多元智能理论 优化设计
分 类 号:G40-058.1[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30