检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹淑萍[1,2] 赵婷[3] 邰晓亮[4] 孟伊娜[1,2] 马燕[1,2] 许铭强[1,2] 张谦[1,2]
机构地区:[1]新疆农业科学院农产品贮藏加工研究所,新疆乌鲁木齐830091 [2]新疆主要农副产品精深加工工程技术研究中心,新疆乌鲁木齐830091 [3]新疆农业科学院农业经济与科技信息研究所,新疆乌鲁木齐830091 [4]乌鲁木齐市农产品质量安全检测中心,新疆乌鲁木齐830091
出 处:《食品工业科技》2017年第11期295-298,共4页Science and Technology of Food Industry
基 金:农业部公益性行业(农业)科研专项课题(201503001-8);新疆农业科学院青年基金项目(xjnkq-2015031)
摘 要:通过对新疆7个品种马铃薯品质测定与聚类分析,筛选出适宜鲜食、加工及鲜食加工兼用的新疆马铃薯主栽品种。结果表明,不同品种马铃薯的主要品质指标均存在显著差异(p<0.05),且个别品质指标间存在一定的相关性。通过聚类分析,将马铃薯7个品种归分为4类。第1类加工型品种为下寨65、夏菠蒂和克新19号;第2类鲜食型品种为中薯18号和紫花白;第3类加工鲜食兼用型品种为费乌瑞它;第4类为青薯9号,加工或者鲜食都不太适宜。The potato varieties for suitably freshly eating,processing and both mainly planted in Xinjiang were screened out through measuring and analyzing the quality and clustering of seven potato varieties.The results showed that the differences in main quality indexes of different potato varieties were signifieant(p 〈 0.05 ).There was a certain correlation of quality indicators between some potato varieties.By cluster analysis,7 potato varieties were classified into the following 4 categories,Xiazhai 65, Xiabodi and Kexin 19 were suitable for processing, Zhongshu No.18 and Zihuahai were appropriate for fresh eat.For Favorata, processing and fresh eat were both proper which was neither for Kexin No.19.
分 类 号:TS201.1[轻工技术与工程—食品科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30