检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王晶晶[1,2] 董福[2] 冯叙桥[1] 陈叙生[3] 程康蓉 段小明[1] 朱璐[2] 吕佳煜 Wang Jingjing Dong Fu Feng Xuqiao Chen Xusheng Cheng Kangrong Duan Xiaoming Zhu Lu Lv Jiayu(Food Science Research Institute of Bohai University, Jinzhou 121013, Liaoning College of Food Science, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866 Yibin Academy of Agricultural Science, Yibin 646400, Sichuan Zhejiang Taizhou Yiguan Food Co., Ltd., Taizhou 318020, Zhejiang)
机构地区:[1]渤海大学化学化工与食品安全学院,辽宁锦州121013 [2]沈阳农业大学食品学院,沈阳110866 [3]宜宾市农业科学院,四川宜宾646400 [4]浙江台州一罐食品有限公司,浙江台州318020
出 处:《中国食品学报》2017年第3期218-224,共7页Journal of Chinese Institute Of Food Science and Technology
基 金:辽宁省科技厅农业攻关及成果产业化项目(2011205001)
摘 要:以凌枣为试材,探究TPA单独或与其它指标相结合用于判定凌枣贮藏时间的可行性。对0℃贮藏过程中凌枣TPA测试结果采用主成分分析法,构建凌枣贮藏期间质地综合评价模型;将贮藏期间凌枣TPA测试结果与可滴定酸、可溶性固形物等品质指标组合在一起做主成分分析,构建凌枣贮藏期间总体品质的综合评价模型。相关分析结果显示:凌枣质地综合得分与贮藏时间两变量之间的Pearson相关系数为-0.791(P<0.05),Spearman相关系数为-0.683(P<0.05);凌枣总体品质综合得分与贮藏时间的Pearson以及Spearman相关系数则分别为-0.802(P<0.01)和-0.683(P<0.05)。两模型得分与凌枣贮藏时间之间符合线性相关规律。比较两模型,凌枣总体品质的综合评价模型得分与贮藏时间之间的线性相关性更强,对凌枣贮藏时间的推断将更为准确。综合考虑推断的准确度以及实际可操作性,将TPA单独应用于凌枣贮藏时间判定更为适宜。The feasibility of using Lingzao (Zizyphus jujube Mill, cv. Lingzao) TPA test data alone or combined with other quality parameters for the detection of its storage time was investigated. Texture comprehensive evaluation model of Lingzao during storage at 0 ℃ was established by principle component analysis method using the TPA test data alone, while Lingzao overall quality evaluation model established using its TPA parameters as well as other quality indexes such as titratable acid, total soluble solids etc. Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients calc, ulated through Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis on the variables of Lingzao texture score and storage time were -0.791 (P〈0.05) and -0.683 (P〈0.05), respectively, and those for the correlation between Lingzao overall quality score and storage time were -0.802 (P〈0.01) and -0.683 (P〈0.05). Linear correlation was more appropriate to reflect either the correlation between Lingzao texture score and storage time or that between Lingzao overall quality score and storage time. Compared with Lingzao texture score, the overall quality score had a stronger linear correlation with its slorage time which made it more capable in the speculation of Lingzao storage duration. However, using TPA alone for the determination of Lingzao storage time is more practical when considerring the optional details.
分 类 号:TS255.3[轻工技术与工程—农产品加工及贮藏工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249