基础教育视域下教师课程教学质量状况调查与分析——基于初中化学课堂教学与课程标准一致性的视角  

Research and Analysis on Teachers' Classroom Teaching Quality in Basic Education——From the Respective of Alignment between Middle School Chemistry Classroom Teaching and Curriculum Standard

作　　者：刘学智[1,2] 陈淑清[3] 王馨若[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学教育学部,吉林长春130024 [2]北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心东北师范大学分中心,吉林长春130024 [3]长春师范大学教育科学学院,吉林长春130031

出　　处：《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第4期204-209,共6页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目(16JZD042);教育部人文社科一般规划项目(13YJA880053);北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心自主课题(2016-03-003-BZK01)

摘　　要：在基础教育视域下,"SEC"模式是检测课程实施程度的有效方法之一。本研究将从化学学习目标与学习主题角度出发,对J省的初中化学课堂教学与课程标准一致性程度现状进行调查与分析,结果发现:在学习目标上,J省初中化学在技能性学习目标上表现的一致性程度最高,体验性学习目标上表现的一致性程度最差;在学习主题上,J省初中在"物质的化学变化"这一化学学习主题上表现的一致性水平最佳,"化学与社会发展"一致性程度最差;在三类地区中,县城类教师在学习目标上的一致性程度最好,城区次之,乡镇最差;在学习主题上,县城类地区的初中化学教师表现的一致性程度最佳,乡镇次之,城区最差。SEC analysis model is considered as the basic procedure and method to measure the alignment between classroom teaching and curriculum standard in elementary education.As a result,this research starts from study goals and topics in Middle School Chemistry,and then investigates on the alignment between classroom teaching and curriculum standard in Middle School Chemistry in J Province.The result shows：in terms of study goals,skill goals in Middle School Chemistry represent the best alignment,while experience goals the worst;in terms of study topics,the topic of＂chemical changes in matters＂stands out in alignment,while the topic of＂chemistry and social development＂the worst.Among three kinds of areas,teachers in counties are the best in alignment of study goals,followed by teachers in cities and those in villages.Meanwhile,teachers from counties also are the best in alignment of study topics,followed by teachers from villages and those from cities.

关 键 词：初中化学 课堂教学 课程标准 一致性 

分 类 号：G42[文化科学—课程与教学论]