检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘同庆 涂诗万[1] LIU Tongqing;TU Shiwan(Faculty of Education,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang,Henan,453007,P.R.China)
出 处:《广东第二师范学院学报》2025年第2期1-14,共14页Journal of Guangdong University of Education
摘 要:生成式人工智能为教育发展提供了新契机,同时也会带来诸如技术自身局限造成隐患、侵蚀基本权利贬斥个体地位、异化教育生态引发本真悬置、工具使用不当致使民主缺位等风险。从陶行知“求真”思想的视角看,生成式人工智能应用于教育存在以下隐忧:技术的天然缺陷,使学生难求真知;个人权利失落,学生难获自由;教育本真悬置,学生难成“真”人;民主精神遮蔽,学生难得共善。因此,需以优质赋能为目标,克服应用局限;培育主体意识,开展人工智能通识教育;以复归本真为指引,加强教育伦理规范;以技术向善为宗旨,筑牢民主共识。Generative artificial intelligence provides new opportunities for the development of education,but also brings risks such as hidden dangers caused by the limitations of technology,the erosion of basic rights and individual status,the alienation of educational ecosystem,and the lack of democracy due to improper use of tools.From the perspective of“quest for the truth”,the application of generative AI in education may pose the following risks:technology restrains students from pursuing true knowledge;diminished individual rights hinder their attainment of freedom;the suspension of authentic education makes it difficult for students to become‘true’individuals;the spirit of democracy is overshadowed and it is difficult for students to get a consensus on goodness.To address these concerns,we propose the following strategies:overcoming limitations in application to provide high-quality empowerment;developing general education of artificial intelligence to cultivate subjective consciousness;restoring the essence of education by strengthening ethical norms in education;maintaining the purpose of technology for good by building a strong democratic consensus.
分 类 号:G40-057[文化科学—教育学原理] G40-02[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.49.72