基于高中生物课程标准的教材对比分析——以《遗传与进化》为例  

Comparative Analysis of Textbooks Based on High School Biology Curriculum Standards——In the Case of "Genetics and Evolution"

作　　者：马伟琴[1] 杨淑萍[1] 剡晓婷 

机构地区：[1]石河子大学师范学院/兵团教育学院,新疆石河子832003

出　　处：《兵团教育学院学报》2015年第3期64-69,共6页Journal of Bingtuan Education Institute

基　　金：教育部人文社科项目(14XJJC880004);石河子大学人文社科中青年人才培育项目;石河子大学3152人才项目

摘　　要：基础教育课程改革促使中学生物教材发生了变化,在此背景下基于普通高中生物课程标准,结合生物教学实践,采用比较分析法,以"遗传与进化"为例对人教版和苏教版两版生物教材从教材目录、编排体例、知识体系、课标实现方式、作业系统及评价指标等方面进行分析比较,结果显示:两版教材目录顺序与内容编排与课标要求不同,编写体例结构一致,栏目设计各有特色,因关注点不同教材内容体系设计思路各异,但基本实现了课标中的具体内容目标,教材构建了多维度的作业评价系统,但评价指标在不同教材间存在差异。The basic education curriculum reform had promoted the changes in middle school biology textbooks.In this context, based on the analysis of the ordinary high school biology curriculum standards, combining the biology teaching practice and using the method of comparative analysis, we analyzed and compared the directory,columns, knowledge system, curriculum implementation, operation and evaluation system of PEP（People＇s Education Press） and Jiangsu Education Press（JEP） textbooks of ＂genetic and evolution＂. The results showed： the two textbooks＇ catalog order and content arrangement are different with the curriculum standards; they are in consonance with the structures of writing style with unique column designs; the different focus leads to different designing ideas of content system. These two kinds of textbooks basically achieve the specific content goals of curriculum by constructing the multi-dimension practice and evaluation system. However, the differences of evaluation system still exist in them.

关 键 词：教材分析 课程标准 人教版教材 苏教版教材 

分 类 号：G633.91[文化科学—教育学]