检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵雷洪[1] 薛松 竺丽英[1] ZHAO Leihong;XUE Song;ZHU Liying(College of Teacher Education,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004,China;School of Education and Social Work,University of Dundee,Dundee DD14HN,the United Kingdom)
机构地区:[1]浙江师范大学教师教育学院,浙江金华321004 [2]邓迪大学教育与社会工作学院,英国邓迪DD14HN
出 处:《浙江师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2020年第2期228-235,共8页Journal of Zhejiang Normal University:Natural Sciences
基 金:教育部产学合作育人项目(201802362009)。
摘 要:为提升中学生的科学建模能力,研究采用前、后测控制组设计的准实验法,以台湾省高雄市某高中一年级的学生为对象,原子结构的内容为例,从模型描述、模型应用、模型调度3个维度,探究基于类比的三阶段建模教学策略与传统的类比教学策略对学生建模能力培养的影响.结果发现:传统的类比教学和基于类比的三阶段建模教学都能有效提升学生的科学建模能力,但后者对模型描述等低阶建模能力的提升效果更加显著,二者对整体建模能力的提升差距还有待论证.研究为中学生科学建模能力的培养提供实证方法的参考.It was aimed to develop students′modelling abilitiy by three-stages of modelling teaching activities based on analogy and traditional analogy teaching.A quasi-experimental research of pre-and post-test control group design was employed.The participants were senior one students from Kaohsiung,Taiwan.Students′modelling abilities were measured from three dimensions,model description,model application,and model deployment in the unit of chemistry"Atomic Structure".The findings revealed that both of two approaches effectively improved students′modelling abilities,while modelling teaching had statistically significant effects on low-order modelling abilities such as model description.However,the gap between two strategies on the overall modelling ability was suggested to be further explored.Implications to the developement of middle school students′modelling ability of science were also dicussed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30